• 2009 Small Grants Competition

    to adopt a cross-learning and iterative approach that will enable all researchers to learn from each other across different types of bio-innovation throughout the region.

  • Overview of the Project

    to enhance biological innovative capabilities, policies & institutions to support just, equitable & sustainable social & economic development in developing countries.

  • Bio-innovations in the NEWS

    Policy briefs and articles on relevant dimensions of bio-innovation.

Enabling bioinnovation for poverty allevation in Asia.
BioInnovation Policies
 
 

Biotechnology in Hybrid Rice Development in Yunnan, China: Policy Process and Implications on Social Equity and Social Inclusion

By: Babette P. Resurreccion, Edsel E. Sajor and Wang Jing

This paper presents recent developments in China’s agricultural and rice biotechnology and associated policy process in this domain. It discusses national developments and policy process in agricultural and rice biotechnology first, and zooms in on the case and experience of Yunnan Province in particular. It further explores and highlights current and emerging trends and outcomes in the widespread adoption of modern hybrid rice, focusing on issues of social equity and gender equality, and social inclusion in the policy process.

The aim of this paper is to inform and contribute to defining the agenda for a comparative research on biotechnology policy process in selected agri-food sectors in five Southeast Asian countries, particularly focusing on social equity outcomes and inclusiveness of the policy-making in this domain.

The paper is divided in six parts, to wit: (1) recent developments in agricultural biotechnology in China; (2) national biotechnology and rice research; (3) policy environment in biotechnology in rice Sector in China; (4) rice cultivation in Yunnan Province; (5) Yunnan’s experience in modern rice hybrid research and applications; and, (6) implications on social equity, gender and social inclusion issues.

Full document download click here (PDF file)




Socio-Economic Impacts And Social Inclusion In Rice Biotechnology Policymaking In Thailand

By: Leilani Gallardo, Kittima Leeruttanawisut, Dr. Apichart Vanavichit

Rice is a major staple food in Asian countries and its cultivation is often steeped in rich tradition and cultural linkages. This phenomenon is clearly apparent in Thailand, the biggest exporter of rice in the world for the last decade. Rice farming, harvesting and preparation permeate every aspect of Thai culture from the 6th century up to the present day. Archaeological evidences have found rice hulls in pieces of pottery and utensils in northeastern Udon Thani Province dating from 5,000 years ago. At present, members of the Thai Royal family often preside over ceremonies and offerings to mark the start of rice planting season and to court blessings from rice deities and goddesses for a good harvest.

Aside from its cultural significance, rice takes center stage as Thailand’s second major agricultural export next to rubber. The country earned USD 2.56 billion (Office of Agriculture Economics, 2008) for selling 7 million tons of rice exports in 2006, capturing 26% of the world rice market. Rice exports for that year also accounted for 10.7 % of Gross Domestic Product . According to the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), rice is planted in 55% of the country’s arable land and is the staple food of the entire population regardless of income. Rice growing also employs roughly 4 million farming households. Thailand has a reputation for high-quality, long-grain white rice, which usually commands a substantial price advantage over lower grades since it began selling rice abroad in the late 19th century.




Socio-Economic Impacts And Social Inclusion In Public Policy Processes: The Case Of Rice Biotechnology In The Philippines

By: Antonio P. Contreras, Ph.D.

Abstract

The paper argues that the development of biotechnology policies in the Philippines vis-à-vis rice is enabled by structures and processes that are friendly to the furtherance of social inclusion and equity goals. This occurs in the context of attaining rice self-sufficiency amidst a globalized system, and is clearly expressed in the relative density of concepts and provisions related to participation, inclusivity and transparency in all the relevant policy instruments. However, spaces that are opened are vulnerable to a political system that has deep-seated structural flaws and a science community whose financial support from the state is limited and at the same time whose financial autonomy from vested interests is suspect. Thus, in addition to investing in research to build scientific knowledge and capacity, there should also be an investment in research on the political dynamics of the institutional domains for multi-stakeholder encounters and contestations. Further research should be done on the nature of the interplay between science, industry and policy, to determine appropriate institutional arrangements in which science-industry linkages remain robust without compromising the regulatory process, and without compromising science. In addition, it is also vital that research is conducted about the knowledge and information flows and communication pathways and their implications on policy outcomes and stakeholder positions. A deliberate effort should be done to study the processes of mythmaking on both sides of the biotechnology debate, and to clearly identify the nexus by which distortions occur, the form by which they happen, their manifestations and the drivers that engender their emergence.

Full document download click here




First meeting of IFPRI-CCAP/CAS project “Gender and Health Impacts of Genetically Engineered Crops in Developing Countries, and Visit to Bt Cotton Farms, 27-30 September 2010

By: Qiaoqiao Zhang
At the invitation of IDRC (Dr Ellie Osir), Qiaoqiao Zhang attended this important project planning meeting. Focusing on China, Philippines, Burkina Faso and with funding from IDRC, the goal of the project, is developing and applying robust, cost effective and implementable gender and health impact assessment methods and guidelines for implementation that will become additional components in the overall socio-economic impact assessment procedures examining GE crops for technology assessment and biosafety/technology regulatory approval purposes. In addition to plan for the project implementation, and exchange information and knowledge among partners, the meeting was intended to establish links and develop synergies with other IDRC funded projects, and projects with funding of other donors. It also introduced the "theory of change" as the methodological approach, and many communication tools to encourage more effective information and knowledge exchange and sharing.
 
At the workshop, Qiaoqiao Zhang introduced the China-UK GMO projects, and provided a briefing on this small grant project, with a view to seeking complementary expertise and developing synergies. She was also able to familiarise with the objectives and methodology of this IFPRI-CCAP/CAS project, and identified how the gender and health impacts of GE crops are related to impacts of GE crops on the rural poor.
 
The organisers also arranged a very useful visit to a farm where Bt cotton are grown. The farm consisting of plots in a number of sites is located in Gaobeidian, Baoding, Hebei Province. After renting plots from other farms, it is now a large-scale house-holder farm (14.5 hectares) headed by Mr Zu Maotang. Mr Zu, with university diploma from the distance learning programme of the China Agricultural University in early 1970s, embraced Bt cotton sooner after it was commercialised in 1997. Starting from growing a variety bred by Monsanto in the first year, his farm grew a number of varieties of Bt cotton over the past 11 years. He is now proudly growing the 3-line hybrid variety bred by scientists of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, which has resulted in 20% increase of yield, and higher quality cotton. Mr Zu has become a dynamic and wealth farming businessman, and in the meantime time feels the obligations of helping other farmers and making sure that farmers’ voices are heard by the Government. He is doing this at the capacity of the Chairman of Farmer Association of Fechnology in their City, which has 6000 members, and help demonstrate and extend new technologies to fellow farmers. He is also keep close links with policy makers and scientists. It is certain that growing Bt cotton has helped him to gain profits and wealth, and helping extend new technologies to fellow farmers has given him great satisfaction.



Socio-Econimic Impacts and Social Inclusion in Public Processes: Agro-Biotechnology Development of Corn in Indonesia

By: Bambang Purwantara
 
Abstract
 
For Indonesia, self-sufficiency in rice, corn, soybean, meat, and chicken/egg are the priorities to be achieved. Just very recently food availability had been focused more for rice, corn and meat (including chicken). In the government departments, it is hard to see a clear and realistic priority program for biotechnology as a part of solution in increasing productivity/production of the mentioned commodities. Biotechnology is at the present being seen still a far away realm in future. This is perhaps in contrast with capacity of development for quite a numbers of work milestones at public and universities research with likelihood of commercial production success could not be ignored. Just to mention a few crops: sugarcane, tomato, potato, soybean and rice. Moreover it is important to note potential (ready now) technology from private sector (multi national companies) especially for corn and rice crops. It had been observed at least since the last 7-8 years that a political mood of the top government leadership (represented by the President) is a key vital trigger for relevant departments or ministries to take initiatives and real progress being made. Frankly speaking, legal frameworks and regulations is deemed sufficient in facilitating evaluation/assessment of biotechnology products for releasing into commercial use (processing or to environment). A study revealed by interviewing experts from public institutions and industry representatives indicated that institutional matters are critical hindrance in moving transgenic technology into commercialization. With regards to biotechnology related legal process/ framework, decision making still largely centralized. Hybrid/variety/line commercial release is a mandate for national body called National Seed Board. It is also important to note that environmental safety assessment would be also key factor. Therefore, it is interesting to see that with a strong institutional framework which provides certainty in procedural steps and decision-making is the utmost focus that current policy needs to deal with.
 
 
Full Document download. Click here. (PDF file)
 



Public Policy in Biotechnology Development in the Thai Shrimp Industry:Agenda Setting, Equity Impacts, and Social Inclusion

By: Bernadette P. Resurreccion and Edsel E. Sajor
 
Thailand is a very dynamic middle-income developing country that has embarked on a track of rapid economic growth strategy. It has emphasized on biotechnology development and research as important components of this strategy and is currently pursuing an aggressive biotechnology research and applications in the food sector.
 
One of the major fields of research in biotechnology in Thailand is the shrimp industry sector. In 1975, Thailand undertook the first successful intensive shrimp culture in Chantaburi province (Shrimp Culture Newsletter, September 2001). The next 15 years saw the spread of intensive shrimp farming in Thailand. Thailand was reported to have become the world’s biggest shrimp exporter by 1990 and the largest shrimp producer by 1995 (Tanticharoen, Valyasevi, Donavanik and Thanapaisal 2003).
 
This paper particularly addresses the dynamics of policy agenda setting in   biotechnology with a special concern for socio-economic impacts and gender equality issues in the shrimp industry sector. Its main objective is to understand how certain issues related to biotechnology applications in the sector become highlighted in public debates, marginalized or ignored. It will try to understand the context and the forces that result in the prioritizing and de-prioritizing of certain agenda in policy debates. The study is principally pitched at the nexus of the national and provincial levels – focusing on shrimp farming in Surat Thani Province of Thailand.
 
Full Document download. Click here. (PDF file)
 



Focus on…. The TLUD

By: Sarah Carter

The TLUD (Top Lit Up Draft) gasifier was originally designed by Paal Wendelbo which he took to Africa in 1988. Since then, the design has been adapted and distributed around the world. A prototype of the design amended by Anderson has been produced and tested in Cambodia. A model was also adapted by ARTI in India.




Biochar Malaysia 2010

By: Sarah Carter
 
Sarah Carter from University of Edinburgh (UoE) one of the grantees of Bio-Innovations Asia participated in the Biochar workshop on 25.03.10 at the University of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
 
It had a varied programme which included the potential of biochars to remediate polluted soils from Dr. Hale and Cornelissen from the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, and some novel methods of passive sampling for contaminants.
 



Can GM food mitigate world hunger?

Source: New York Times
 
A series of comments were published in The New York Times on the topics whether genetically modified (GM) food can mitigate world hunger or if other changes in food production are needed.
 
According to Paul Collier from Oxford University, climate change has made the adoption of GM essential. Particularly, Africa will need to accelerate crop adaptation and increase yields to cope with a changing climate and the fast growing population.

Per Pinstrup-Andersen from Cornell University thinks growing more food without damaging natural resources is essential. Science — including GM technology — must play a key role in helping farmers do this. New technologies must, of course, be tested before being released for commercial use but must also be weighed up against the health risks of not using them.

 




GM crops: still not a panacea for poor farmers

9 February 2010
Source: SciDev. Net
Author: Dominic Glover
 
GM crops have been hailed as a 'pro-poor' technology, but the reality is much more complicated, says technology researcher Dominic Glover.
 
Genetically modified (GM) crops have been celebrated by some academics, commentators and analysts as a success for poor people in the developing world, with small-scale farmers able to benefit more than most from the technology. 
  
But a closer look at the experiences of farmers reveals a more complicated picture.
It takes much more than the introduction of one or two new genes into a crop plant to transform a complex farming system. Many other technical, agro-ecological, economic and institutional factors must also be in place before poor and marginal farmers can reap the potential benefits of GM crops.
 



Syndicate content