• 2009 Small Grants Competition

    to adopt a cross-learning and iterative approach that will enable all researchers to learn from each other across different types of bio-innovation throughout the region.

  • Overview of the Project

    to enhance biological innovative capabilities, policies & institutions to support just, equitable & sustainable social & economic development in developing countries.

  • Bio-innovations in the NEWS

    Policy briefs and articles on relevant dimensions of bio-innovation.

Enabling bioinnovation for poverty allevation in Asia.

Innovations Society

Interactive policy research for rural innovation

By: Dr Rajeswari S. Raina
(2008) in Wickremasinghe, S. I. And Gupta, V. K. (Eds.) Science & Technology Policy and Indicators for Development – Perspectives from Developing Countries, NAM S&T Centre and Daya Publishing House, pp. 230-253

Abstract
S&T policy makers use policies and policy research inputs that are inadequate to enable innovation for poverty reduction in developing countries. This paper presents lessons on technological and institutional change, from recent research on rural innovation. It argues that policy relevant information for innovation can be generated through processes that entail interactive learning. The indicators of innovation that policy makers can use are highly context specific process indicators. In order to enable rural innovation, policy makers must acknowledge that S&T is only one among several other sources of knowledge. Like all other components of an innovation system S&T policy has to go through processes of institutional learning and change.

Key words: S&T policy, Rural innovation, Indicators, Competency, Technology, R&D, Science, Technology & Innovation (STI)




The Social Shaping of Technology

By Robin Williams and David Edge

appears in Research Policy Vol. 25, (1996) pp. 856-899

 
INTRODUCTION
This paper reviews the body of research that addresses `the social shaping of technology' (SST) (MacKenzie & Wajcman 1985). In contrast to traditional approaches which only addressed the outcomes or 'impacts' of technological change, this work examines the content of technology and the particular processes involved in innovation. We highlight the growth of socio-economic research falling within this very broad definition of SST. It explores a range of factors - organisational, political, economic and cultural - which pattern the design and implementation of technology.
SST has gained increasing recognition in recent years, particularly in the UK and Europe, as a valuable research focus1, for its broader import for the scientific and policy claims of social sciences. SST is seen as playing a positive role in integrating natural and social science concerns; in offering a greater understanding of the relationship between scientific excellence, technological innovation and economic and social well-being; and in broadening the policy agenda, for example in the promotion and management of technological change (European Science Foundation/Economic and Social Research Council 1991, Newby 1992).



How Innovative Is Your Agriculture?

Using Innovation Indicators and Benchmarks to Strengthen National Agricultural Innovation Systems

By: David J. Spielman, Regina Birner Agriculture & Rural Development Department World Bank

(c) 2008 To download full document (PDF File) Click here

Agricultural science, technology, and innovation are vital to promoting rural development and poverty reduction. To this end, many studies on agricultural research, extension, and education have highlighted the importance of public investment and policies in these areas. However, as agricultural innovation becomes increasingly viewed as a complex process that defies simple solutions, it has become more and more difficult to identify the types of investment and policy interventions needed to make developing-country agriculture more responsive, dynamic, and competitive. 

The “national system of innovation” framework offers an interesting perspective for guiding investment and policy interventions in this area. The framework draws attention to the wide range of actors and organizations from the public, private, and civil society sectors that are involved in bringing new products, processes, and forms of organization into economic use. The framework also emphasizes the role of the institutional and policy environment that affects their performance and behavior. Applying this innovation systems framework is particularly promising for agricultural development because it can help identify where the most binding constraints to agricultural innovation are located and how better to target interventions to remove such constraints. 




Breaking New Ground in the Philippines: Opportunities to Improve Human and Environmental Well-Being

Policy brief published by the Population Reference Bureau (November 2004)

To download Full Document click here

In the face of mounting development challenges, people and communities across the Philippines are breaking new ground in designing innovative programs that address human and environmental well-being in holistic ways. By tackling multiple issues simultaneously, these projects are enabling communities to reap immediate benefits while laying the groundwork for sustained health and livelihoods.

But further government support and crosssectoral cooperation is needed to sustain and expand these efforts. This policy brief explores the interconnections among urgent issues related to population, health, and environment in the Philippines; highlights programs that address these issues in an integrated fashion; and outlines next steps that can advance the country’s comprehensive development efforts.

 




Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems

©2007 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

To download Full Document click here

Investments in knowledge—especially in the form of science and technology— have featured prominently and consistently in most strategies to promote sustainable and equitable agricultural development at the national level. Although many of these investments have been successful, the context for agriculture is changing rapidly, sometimes radically.

Six changes in the context for agricultural development heighten the need to examine how innovation occurs in the agricultural sector:

  1. Markets, not production, increasingly drive agricultural development.

  2. The production, trade, and consumption environment for agriculture and agricultural products is growing more dynamic and evolving in unpredictable ways.

  3. Knowledge, information, and technology increasingly are generated, diffused, and applied through the private sector.

  4. Exponential growth in information and communications technology has transformed the ability to take advantage of knowledge developed in other places or for other purposes.

  5. The knowledge structure of the agricultural sector in many countries is changing markedly.

  6. Agricultural development increasingly takes place in a globalized setting.

    Can new perspectives on the sources of agricultural innovation yield practical approaches to agricultural development that may be more suited to this changing context? That is the central question explored here.

 




The Slow Race: Making technology work for the poor

By: Melissa Leach and Ian Scoones, 2006

The science races are on. After decades of relative neglect, science and technology are firmly back on the international development agenda. Science is woven into the UN’s eight Millennium Development Goals. The 2005 report from the Commission for Africa recommends that $3 billion should be invested in developing centres of excellence in science and technology. New scientific initiatives such as the GFATM (Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria) are emerging and attracting funding through schemes such as the International Finance Facility championed by Gordon Brown. In Dakar in September 2005, Yaye Kene Gamassa Dia, the president of the recently created Committee of African Science Ministers, spoke of the need for ‘a new vitality in the scientific and technological systems of African countries’. In the UK, the Department for International Development (DFID) appointed a chief scientific adviser to produce a science strategy for development.

Read the whole document at:

http://www.demos.co.uk/files/The%20Slow%20Race.pdf




Agricultural Innovation Systems: From Diagnostics toward Operational Practices

© 2008 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank

By: Riikka Rajalahti, Willem Janssen, Eija Pehu

Executive Summary
Agricultural development depends to a great extent on how successfully knowledge is generated and applied, and indeed knowledge intensiveness has featured prominently in most strategies to promote agricultural development. Yet the changing context for agricultural development has highlighted a strong need to understand and adopt innovation systems thinking.
An innovation system can be defined as a network of organizations, enterprises, and individuals that focuses on bringing new products, new processes, and new forms of organization into economic use, together with the institutions and policies that affect their behavior and performance. The innovation systems concept extends beyond the creation of knowledge to encompass the factors affecting demand for and use of knowledge in novel and useful ways. Innovation systems not only help to create knowledge; they provide access to knowledge, share knowledge, and foster learning. Given the diversity and context-specificity of innovation systems approaches, in March 2007 the World Bank organized a workshop in which about 80 experts (representing donor agencies, development and related agencies, academia, and the World Bank) took stock of recent experiences with innovation systems in agriculture and reconsidered strategies for their future development. This paper summarizes the workshop findings and uses them to develop and discuss key issues in applying the innovation systems concept. The workshop’s recommendations, including next steps for the wider innovation systems community, are also presented.




Social Decision-making Processes in Local Contexts: An STS Case Study on Nuclear Power Plant Siting in Japan

By: Kohta Juraku & Tatsujiro Suzuki & Osamu Sakura

(c) National Science Council, Taiwan 2007

This is an STS case study of the social decision-making process on the siting of a nuclear power plant in Japan, from the point of view of a sociological case analysis. Energy technologies are critically important for industrial society but often trigger serious disputes through the R&D phase and the phase involving introduction into society. Nuclear power technology especially has provoked a lot of conflicts all over the world. By focusing on serious trust issues among decision-making
processes and stakeholders, we found very interesting consequences and/or results of participatory social decision-making process in nuclear issues. As an example, we take up the case of a local referendum in the siting area (Maki-machi town, Niigata prefecture of Japan) and describe and analyze it to highlight the critical sociological factors involved in the application of participatory methods in social decisionmaking processes regarding technological issues. Through this description and analysis, we would like to emphasize the effects of the complicated and subtle
structure of local context on the consequence of local decision-making processes. We then propose a concept, “relevant marginal actor,” to clarify which actors play critical roles in the whole local decision-making process in which controversial technological issues are framed, and reframed.




Innovations in innovations:reflections on partnerships, institutions & learning

AJ Hall, B Yoganand, Rasheed Sulaiman V, Rajeswari S Raina, C.Shambu Prasad, Guru C Naik and NG Clark(2004)

This book explores the nature of innovation processes associated with socio-economic change in rural areas of developing countries. It brings together a collection of empirical and conceptual papers that discuss contemporary experiences and perspectives. Most of the papers explore these issues with a view to providing lessons for the agricultural research community and in particular lessons on ways of more effectively deploying agricultural science and technology as part of the socio-economic development process.
This emphasis responds to the growing sense that, while agricultural science continues to be an important policy instrument in rural development and poverty reduction, research efforts need to be less isolated and more closely linked to social, economic, and policy domains in which they seek to bring about change. This mirrors other shifts in development practice where processes are becoming more inclusive, consultative, and participatory and where the roles of the State and other players in the development process are being revisited. While these developments offer great opportunities for progress, they also bring challenges. Not least of these challenges is the need for agricultural research to respond reactively to a wide range of interest groups and agendas. And, given the rapid pace of change of modern economic systems, new arrangements need to be nimble and responsive as agendas, priorities, and opportunities are likely to evolve very quickly indeed.

To download full document (PDF File) click here.




Post-harvest innovations in innovation: reflections on partnership and learning

Hall A J, Yoganand B, Sulaiman R V, and Clark N G. (eds.). 2003.

In the post-harvest area and in agriculture research in general, both in India and
internationally, policy attention is returning to the question of how innovation can be
encouraged and promoted and thus how impact on the poor can be achieved. This
publication assembles several cases from the post-harvest sector. These provide examples
of successful innovation that emerged in quite different ways. Its purpose is to illustrate
and analyze the diversity and often highly context-specific nature of the processes that
lead to and promote innovation. The presented cases suggest a number of generic principles
needed to develop the capacity of innovation systems: the need to pay more attention to
revealing and managing the historical and institutional context of partnerships and
relationship; the need to build on local contexts and circumstance rather than introducing
external blueprints; and the need to strengthen the learning process and to link this to
the broader agenda of institutional change, particularly concerning the governance of
public science endeavors.

Download full document (PDF File) here.